The jurisdictions that took the top 10 places, in order, were New Zealand, Switzerland, Hong Kong, Australia, Canada, the Netherlands and Denmark (tied in 6th place), Ireland and the United Kingdom (tied in 8th place), and Finland, Norway, and Taiwan (tied in 10th place). Selected countries rank as follows: Germany (13), the United States and Sweden (17), Republic of Korea (27), Japan (31), France and Chile (32), Italy (34), South Africa (63), Mexico (75), Kenya (82), Indonesia (85), Argentina and Turkey (tied in 107th place), India and Malaysia (tied in 110th place), United Arab Emirates (117), Russia (119), Nigeria (132), China (135), Pakistan (140), Zimbabwe (143), Saudi Arabia (146), Iran (153), Egypt (156), Iraq (159), Venezuela (161), and Syria (162).
https://www.cato.org/human-freedom-index-new New Zealand and Hong kong got you beat cowboy
The passion for destruction is also a creative passion. Mikhail Bakunin
Debra AI Prediction
Arguments
I do not like the degree of economical freedoms the US at the moment provides, but as far as social freedoms go we, pretty much, are on top of the world. The US is the only country having an explicit constitutional prohibition of state-issued censorship in the world, and even though that prohibition is not always respected, in practice it applies to everyone but the very negligible minority of people.
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.82  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: political freedoms people    Different countries   Hong Kong   central government  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
What inspired your forum statement?
"Americans are not free, at least not as free as they think, or compared to Canadians, or the Dutch."
@billbatard, are you maybe not an American citizen, and your posed statements, maybe speaks to that probability?
  Considerate: 64%  
  Substantial: 41%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.82  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
I somewhat disagree... US citizen are more free in some areas and less in others, it's far from being a binary issue...
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: US citizen    areas   binary issue    
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 68%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: cato institute    America isnt   arm of the Libertarian party   index  
  Relevant (Beta): 78%  
  Learn More About Debra
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cato_Institute
"The Cato Institute is an American libertarian think tank headquartered in Washington, D.C. It was founded as the Charles Koch Foundation in 1974 by Ed Crane, Murray Rothbard, and Charles Koch,[6]chairman of the board and chief executive officer of the conglomerate Koch Industries.[nb 1] In July 1976, the name was changed to the Cato Institute.[6][7] Cato was established to have a focus on public advocacy, media exposure and societal influence.[8] According to the 2017 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report(Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program, University of Pennsylvania), Cato is number 15 in the "Top Think Tanks Worldwide" and number 10 in the "Top Think Tanks in the United States."
America is as "free," as the criminals, the offenders, and some of the illegal aliens,or immigrants allow the country to be, via their individual crimes being committed against their individual victims.
Perhaps it could be said, that other countries are as free, in the same sense?
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 82%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.14  
  Sources: 17  
  Relevant (Beta): 39%  
  Learn More About Debra
I'm not sure how many if any have a right to bear arms
Canada the gilded cage
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 40%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: free speechI    country   cage   right  
  Relevant (Beta): 78%  
  Learn More About Debra
A whole lot of countries have a right to free speech in their Constitution...
The right to bear arms? True it ain't a right in the Canadian Constitution but Canadians don't see that as a "right" anyway but as a privilege that is regulated and licensed, similar to laws that allow Canadians to drive cars. It's is not even an issue for Canadians except for a very small fringe... This fringe is going slightly bunkers right now because we're opening discussions about banning handguns in Canada right now...
Funny thing though, John A. MacDonald (Prime Minister (1867–1873, 1878–1891)) generally opposed new gun laws, arguing that "citizens needed arms to protect themselves from American criminals who crossed into Canada," We should've built a wall to protect ourselves from the "bad yankees"...
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 84%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.26  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
can you name one? I didn't see any on the list that was like what is in the U.S. constitution.
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 57%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 79%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.44  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: whole lot of countries    free speech   Constitution   list  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
Are you saying that US free-speech is the only "real" free-speech??
But sure, here are a few countries with Constitutional free-speech rights: Canada, France, Germany, Spain, Portugal (most if not all of Europe really), Israel, Japan, and it goes on....
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 65%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
There is a difference though between a passage in favor of free speech rights, and a passage against infringement on free speech. The former, indeed, many constitutions have; even the USSR constitution had a similar clause. The latter, however, is what really defines a true free speech protection.
A simple clause in support of free speech is based on allowance, that is that, by default, free speech is not allowed, and the government explicitly allows it. The clause against the infringement on free speech, on the other hand, protects the natural free speech rights from being impeded by the government.
The difference here is between the approaches "what is not allowed is prohibited" and "what is not prohibited is allowed". Subtle as the difference may seem, it is enormous in practice. You do not need to state "People are allowed to eat apples", because it is assumed by default. When you do need to state "People are allowed to speak freely", then some cultural problem becomes obvious. It is not something that should be stated, it is something that should be assumed, and a protection should be in place against the infringements on it. This is what the US has, and, as far as I know, no other system does.
The US also does not have a perfect one. The US protects free speech from being infringed upon by the federal government, but the local governments are still free to restrict it. It is unfortunate, but it is still the best the world has as of now.
---
It is also worth noting that speech free from the government is not necessarily free from everything else. In this regard, I am not so convinced that the US has the freest speech in the world. Something like Finland or Denmark may have fewer legal protections in place, but in practice people will let each other say whatever they want there with no repercussions.
On the other hand, in the US a large fraction of the society is somewhat retrograde, and while the government will not punish you for expressing the unpopular opinion, some people will try to do everything they can to silence you. Corporations also often have little respect for free speech within their domains - say, Youtube bans countless videos relentlessly over things they seem as dangerous.
Small developing democracies like Estonia or Taiwan in this regard may be the nations with the freest speech in the world. The giants like the US or France can be much more conserved in their long-lasting culture to embrace novel ideas as openly.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
True, there are differences... But even in the US, right to free speech is not absolute, now is that a good thing? I guess we could debate it...
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 40%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: free speech    good thing   differences   right  
  Relevant (Beta): 82%  
  Learn More About Debra
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 75%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
Are you saying that in the US, free speech is absolute??
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 21%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.26  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: free speech    nbsp      
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
seriously?
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 11%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 50%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.26  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
Another said: "A people who values its privileges above its principles soon loses BOTH"! D.D. Eisenhower
Those are the dangers we face today with the swamp we have in Washington, (the one that was supposed to have been drained :-), and in the report I saw, The U.S. was rated 17th. How the proud have fallen. :-(
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.32  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 86%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 49%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 81%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.5  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: 23rd place    right direction   nbsp   AlofRI  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
think about it, who's rights would be threatened? those who don't agree with the majority or are deemed unworthy by the majority. You don't have to protect speech you agree with, the protection is for the speech you don't.
rights are not privileges you must not be American if you don't know the difference, or a very ignorant one if you are, one or the other.
wow you are really off the reservation on this, try a better search engine or something.
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.6  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
Is this a comment based on land of the free and home of the brave in a song? A comment based on the establishment of freedom from slavery? In basic principle a person does not realistically want to be free they wish to maintain a self-value in relationship to assigned cost if informed in an intention of whole truth.
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: basic principle    self-value   comment   whole truth  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Perhaps you simply do not understand the concept of a right. No one's rights are threatened when someone speaks their mind. There is no "right to not be exposed to opinions one does not want to hear", nor can there be.
Many people nowadays do not understand the difference between a right and a privilege. A right is the legal ability of one to act. A privilege is the legal guarantee for one to receive. A right is the right for free speech. A guarantee is a guarantee to be protected from others exercising their right for free speech. These two are at an impasse, and liberal societies value rights higher than guarantees, giving up on safety and security in the name of freedom and liberty.
People with collectivist views have never been big on freedoms and liberties. They want everything to be controlled, everyone to be protected from the scary real world. Fortunately for us, this nation was founded on very different principles. And according to those principles, what you personally see as "abuse" is the exact opposite of abuse.
One cannot "abuse free speech", by its very design. One can, however, abuse their legal powers to infringe on people's right for free speech.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.16  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
The United State in whole is a basic principle of freedom from independence, when not speaking directly in the context of holdings of America as the United States of America. The whole truth is we are many independent states with a liberty founded on freedom of judicial separation set with constitutional goal as common defense, which is centered around a nation with belief as goal in a equality to liberty by prudence in legal matters both foreign and domestic.
F.Y.I.
In Context Canada, Europe, Asia, and United Arab Emirates are not in the contest to be in Untied State of judicial basic principle combined with legal precedent are they?
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.24  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: United State    national defense   common defense   legal matters  
  Relevant (Beta): 76%  
  Learn More About Debra